Talk:Publicani

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Publicani as corporations

If I understand what I'm reading, there were the publicani, or societates publicanorum, which were corporations, in addition to the individual publicans; see J.A. Crook, Law and Life of Rome (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press), 235 ff. The wording of the article could be clearer on this point, but I don't know enough about the corporations to update it. modify 18:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate comma?

"The publicans were usually of the class of equites, or capitalists."

"Capitalist" is a pretty poor description of the equites, who were, more properly, nobles or aristocrats. Is this phrase supposed to lack the comma and read: "The publicans were usually of the class of equites or [were] capitalists"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.208.202 (talk) 01:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Might not this page be better titled Publicanus - which is, after all, the original language term and avoids the bizarre conflict with the more typical use of the word "Publican" in English? 146.200.253.104 (talk) 21:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent

What a truly excellent article. If I knew how, I would recommend it for 'article of the day'. DlronW (talk) 17:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to publicani

Oxford Classical Dictionary has this topic under publicani, which is also – in my reading – the common name. Ifly6 (talk) 18:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BC?

Is BCE standard for Wikipedia? I noted that this article uses BC and it struck me as odd. 211.29.235.230 (talk) 19:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ERA. But I think in general BC/AD are more common across WP:CGR articles. Ifly6 (talk) 19:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Publican" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Publican has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 9 § Publican until a consensus is reached. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 00:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]