While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
It is important to note that there is no such thing as "LGBTQ". It is 2 completely unrelated groups of people classified as 1 almost entirely by the latter. Inside of my opinion, this should definitely be addressed at some point, although I don't know how. Kelpor (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This has been discussed at great length across multiple WP talk pages and the relevant WikiProject. I don't think you'll find any change in consensus on this matter. Read the archives over at Talk:Queer, for example. Lewisguile (talk) 08:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It certainly is that argument, because claiming that "queer" has no overlap with "lesbian, gay, bisexual" is absurd.
The existence of a united queer community that includes variations of people who are non-heterosexual, non-cisgender, and non-allosexual goes back decades, whether any individual likes it or not. And unfortunately, Gay and transgender people are targeted by this conspiracy theory, so the inclusion of both is necessary. EllieDellie (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The wording of the short description is weird: "Conspiracy theory falsely accusing LGBTQ people of child grooming". The "falsely" part doesn't even make sense. The allegation itself can't be "false" when it is also a conspiracy theory 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6405:BFB4:1083:59C0 (talk) 23:39, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Falsely accusing" means making a false accusation or assertion about someone or something. The short description is written in correct English grammar. I am not sure what you mean when you say it "doesn't even make sense", but it stands as it is. Ringo62 (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't make any sense when combined with "conspiracy theory". If it's a "false allegation", why is it also a conspiracy theory? Why is there a need for a conspiracy theory when it's already "proven false"? The article also doesn't call it false, so why does the short description? 2A02:810D:BC82:1E00:6405:BFB4:1083:59C0 (talk) 01:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Ringo62 (talk) 00:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
