The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum and Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
I am Doug Mastriano's nephew, and I can say that in my 39 years of life that my uncle is does not condone nor believe in the ideologies of the "Far-Right". He is however a man of faith (Christian Conservative if you wish to give it a label). Citing bias media articles with clear slander and defamation is not fact, and therefore does not hold up to the "integrity" the wikipedia is supposedly trying to champion. I am very disappointed as I have always looked to Wikipedia as a source for unbiased, objective, fact based information source.
As to my credibility to speak on the matter. I also served in the Army, am a Texan, who is married to a woman of color (Latina)... and also a man of faith. By that standard, am I "Far Right"? I don't think so, yet I dont expect to be liked for my beliefs. But that is subjective. So which source is the more credible? A journalist with questionable integrity that writes a an article clearly aimed to defame, weaponizing public opinion? OR A relative that has known him intimately for their entire life? There is bias either way I guess. But I care only for the truth and so should this platform. Therefore I recommend a return to objective fact and truth rather subjective hearsay, gossip, and slander. Its not my website, so the choice is yours. Do you stand on integrity and truth or wish to perpetuate a false narrative? DescipleTex (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your input. So you know, your family relationship with the subject adds a conflict of interest situation. Two of Wikipedia's a content policies are no original research and verifiability, which is why articles are to be based on published information from reliable sources. If you have published information from reliable sources to verify your comments, you are welcome to identify it here and request that an editor include it in this article. —ADavidB18:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
