Mizo people

Mizo

Mizo hnam
Mizo traditional Cheraw dance
Total population
1,400,000+ (2011–2019)
Regions with significant populations
India	1,022,616
Mizoram	914,026
Manipur	55,581
Assam	33,329
Meghalaya	6,439
Tripura	5,810
Arunachal Pradesh	1,445
Nagaland	1,264
United States	50,000
Israel	6,000
Languages
Mizo
Religion
Majority: Christianity Minority: Judaism, Buddhism, and Mizo religion
Related ethnic groups
Kukish-speaking peoples (Chin people, Kuki people, Karbi people and Southern Naga people (Zo). Others Naga people, and Jingpo people)

The Mizo people, (historically called the Lushais) are a Tibeto-Burman ethnic group primarily from Mizoram in northeastern India with communities beyond Mizoram, living in neighboring northeast Indian states like Manipur, Assam, Meghalaya, and Tripura, with minority populations also found in Myanmar and the United States. Mizoram is the most literate state in India, and the first to become fully literate.

The Chin people of Myanmar and the Kuki people of India and Bangladesh are the kindred tribes of Mizos and many of the Mizo migrants in Myanmar have accepted the Chin identity. The Chin, Kuki, Mizo, and southern Naga peoples are collectively known as Zo people (Mizo: Zohnahthlak; lit. "descendants of Zo") which all speak the Mizo language.

The Mizo language, also known as Duhlien, is part of the Tibeto-Burman language family. Regionally the language is classed within the Zohnahtlak languages among the Zo people.

Before British rule in the Lushai Hills, the Mizo people organized themselves under a system of Mizo chieftainship. A notable chiefdom was the Confederacy of Selesih. Other notable chiefdoms were Tualte under Vanhnuailiana and Aizawl under Lalsavunga. Following British annexation of the Lushai Hills, the Mizos adopted Christianity via the influence of missionaries. In the decolonisation period, the Mizo people asserted political representation with the founding of the Mizo Union.

The Lushai Hills was constituted as an autonomous district of Assam before being renamed to the Mizo district. Following the mautam famine of 1959, the Mizo National Front declared independence in the Mizo National Front uprising in 1966. The Indian government responded with the Bombing of Aizawl and an extensive village regrouping policy to curb the insurgency. The unrest continued until 1986, when Mizoram was inaugurated as a state.

Definition and subgroups

Main article: List of Mizo clans

The term "Mizo" is a collective name for the people inhabiting the State of Mizoram who have close affinity in dialect, origins and customs. The words Mizo liberally refers to the hill people living in Mizoram but certain groups such as Chakmas, Reangs and Nepalis are not considered Mizo due to their lack of affinity. Mizo is thus used to include the people who share a common origin of migrating into present-day Mizoram. The main clans under the Mizo term are Hmar, Lusei, Ralte, Chawngthu, Khawlhring, Vangchhe, Chawhte, Ngente, Rawite, Khiangte, Paite, Renthlei, Tlau, Fanai, Lai, and other minor clans in certain cases of Thado, Sukte etc.

There are as many as 17 clans of the Mizos and numerous subclans within them. These clans have their own dialects and customs, however the dialects differ very little and it interchangeably understood. Duhlien functions as the lingua franca of the Mizos.

Subgroups

There are five major clans or tribes of the Mizo people which are Hmar, Lusei, Ralte, Lai (Pawi), and Mara (Lakher) which are known as the awzia.

Hmar

Main article: Hmar people

Hmar in the Lusei dialect of Mizo means "north," indicating that the Hmars lived at the north of the Luseis. They are descendants of Manmasi and term themselves Manmasi-nau (children of Manmasi), who came out of the Chhinlung cave, known as Sinlung in the Hmar dialect. Historical settlements of Mizoram such as Biate, Champhai and Vangchhia were historically inhabited by the Hmars.

The Hmar population decreased since the 1901 census as many began to consider themselves Mizo. The tribe currently claim a population of 150,000 under the Mizo classification. The Hmars traditionally participated in artisan works such as blacksmithing, carpentry, brass workings and pottery.

The Hmar were politically active within the Mizo community with the influence of educated elites from the Indian plains. Prominent Hmar statesmen were H.K Bawichhuaka and Pachhunga, who played significant roles in the early period of the Mizo Union. However, following the formation of the Union Territory of Mizoram, the Hmars became discontent with the deprivation of representation, where political power was vested within the Lusei and the Pawi-Lakher autonomous council. The discontent was intensified following the Mizo Accord and the ascension of Mizoram to statehood. The Hmar People's Convention and Hmar Volunteer Cell formed a separatist movement. The organisations demanded for the formation of an autonomous region for the Hmar inhabited regions in Mizoram, Manipur and Cachar. The Hmars settled an accord in 1994 before various factors led to a splinter with a demand for a separate Hmar state instead.

Lusei

See also: Mizo Chieftainship

A picture of Lusei chiefs Sitting from L to R: Kairuma Biate khaw chief, Thanruma Bawlte chief, Khamliana Lungleng chief,Suakhnuna Tachhip chief Standing from L to R:Lalluaia Reiek chief, Hrangvunga Tripura Zampui tlangdung chief, Not known.

The former Mizo term Lushai descends from the Lusei tribe and was popularised following the Lushai Expedition. Originally, it referred to the tribes occupying south of Cachar, and began to be used as a term for all tribes west of the Kaladan river. The origin of the Lusei clan is relatively unknown compared to other Mizo subgroups. However, the Lusei claim to be distinct as early as settlement in the Chin Hills. Lusei is argued to be a linguistic classification for individuals who speak the Duhlien dialect. However, there is no genealogy for the Lusei as Lusei historiography has been dominated by chieftain dynasties such as the Sailo. The Paites claim that the Lusei descend from Boklua, an illegitimate son of the Paite chief Ngehguka.

The Lusei are also known as Duhlian. Traditionally, they were identified by how they tied their hair on the back of their head. The existing Lushei Chiefs all claim to descendants of a certain Thangura, who is sometimes to Shakespear said to have sprung from the union of a Burman with a Paihte woman. In Mizo historiography, Thangur is the son of Zahmuaka, the first Lusei chief.

Ralte

The word Ralte is made up of two words: ral meaning "enemy" and te being a plural marker. Due to the Chhinglung origin story, the Ralte people are regarded to be the noisiest members of the Mizo.

The Ralte claim to be the last group to leave Chhinlung with the mythical ancestors known as Hehua and Leplupi. Their two sons, Kheltea and Siakenga, who quarrelled over the distribution of their father's goods, led to the younger Kheltea setting up a separate village and establishing the two main branches of the Ralte clan. Famous Ralte chiefs include Mangkhaia, who was captured and ransomed but killed by Vanpuilal, who did not receive a share of the ransom. Mangkhaia's memorial is famous in Mizoram for this. The Ralte were distinguished from the larger Lusei clan for maintaining their dialect and being known for not building zawlbuks originally until being absorbed by Lusei chiefs. The Khelte and Siakeng themselves differ little apart from traditional sacrificial customs.

Lai (Pawi)

Main article: Lai people

A picture of 3 Fanai clansmen

Pawi is a name given by Lusei to those who tie their hair on the top of their foreheads. The Pawi refer to themselves as Lai. Hakha, or Halkha in the Mizo language, is the capital city of Chin State which is the main settlement of Pawis in Myanmar, where they are known as the Hakha Chin people.

The Hakha Chin people do not identify themself as Mizo and prefer the name Lai or Chin. This is due to the political decision under Section 2(4) of the Chin Special Division Act amended in 1957. Mizos in Burma adopted the Chin identity to become Burmese citizens. As a result half of the Mizo population were effectively discouraged to call themselves Mizos.

Fanai chief Zakapa from 1909.

In 1953, India adopted a constitution defining itself as a sovereign democratic republic. At that time, the Lai people of the southern part of Mizoram, a segment of the much larger population of Lai/Chin, were granted an Autonomous District Council under the Sixth Schedule of the constitution in support of their identity. Lawngtlai was created as the headquarters of Lai Autonomous District Council.

Mara (Lakher)

Main article: Mara people

The Mara people are known by different names: they are referred to as Lakher by the Lusei, Shendu by the Arakanese though they identify themselves as Mara. They primarily inhabit the southeastern region of the Lushai Hills. While the Maras are believed to have originated in the north, historical accounts suggest that they migrated from various locations within central Chin State, likely due to external pressures from the east. Their migration route to their present settlements can be traced with relative accuracy. Their settlement in the Lushai Hills is estimated to have been established around 200 to 300 years ago.

Etymology

The term Mizo is derived from two Mizo words: Mi and Zo. Mi in Mizo means "person" or "civilian". Zo means hill. According to Schendel, Zo means 'highland' or perhaps 'remote'.

During the British colonial era, the Mizo people were known as the Lushai people, an anglicised form of Lusei, one of the prominent clans among the Mizo people.

The Mizo people were known as the Ka Lin Kaw or the Kalinko (ကလင်ကော့) by the Burmans when 800 Mizo men joined Maha Bandula's cavalry in 1823 though detailed etymological studies specific to this name are limited.

There is a theory that due to the alpine climate, the hill people could've been named Zomi or Mizo as "people of the cold regions". By this definition, Zo means cold region, and Mi means men. However, outside groups' lack of continuation of this name doesn't support the theory.

Lalthangliana argues that the name derives from the town they built in about 1765. The town was Zopui under Lallula, the progenitor of the modern Sailo chiefs. Due to Lallula's success in raids against their enemies, the Chins, it is plausible that the people prided themselves on their settlement name as the Braves of Zopui. Pui means big, hence Zopui, which means the big town of Zo. Due to the fact the term Mizo wasn't included in the 1901 British census and became common by the 1960s, it supports the theory of Mizo being a modern name. In the 1961 census of India, 28000 Hmar, 109000 Lusei, 9000 Paihte, 40000 Pawi and 41000 Ralte declared themselves as Mizos which constituted 96% of the total population. In Burma, the identification of individuals as Mizos decreased. This was because unless they did identify as Chin, the government of Burma did not consider them citizens.

The popularisation of the term Mizo is also argued to be a political influence. The emergence of the Mizo Union began to replace the terms of Lusei or Lushai with Mizo as a conscious choice to incorporate all the tribes of the district at the time. In 1954, the Lushai Hills district was transformed into the Mizo District with a change of name act.

Mizo is a broad ethnic classification of subgroups or clans inhabiting Mizoram (in colonial times the Lushai Hills) in India. Members of many subgroups, especially speakers of the Central Kuki-Chin languages have joined and adopted the Mizo category.

Ancestral Origins

Chhinlung

See also: Chhinlung

Some Mizos have a belief that their ancestors left a place known as "Chhinlung" to immigrate. Some agree that this location is in Northwest China near the upper Mekong Valley. Lalthangliana argues that the Tibeto-Burman ancestors of the Mizos resided in the Tao Valley of present-day Gansu, northeast of Tibet. The Mizos have songs and tales that have been passed down from one generation to the next by influential people about the splendor of the old Chhinlung civilization. It is argued that Chin refers to the Qin Dynasty and that lung in the Mizo language refers to the heart as well as rock, hence possibly referring to the heartland of the Qin Empire at the time.

Guite argues that the Chhinlung cavern or cave wasn't the origin of the Mizo tribes but rather an important settlement along their migration routes into their present day settlements. Zawla argues that the Mizos originated from the Great Wall of China built in 225 BC. Zawla suggests the Mizos were a Mongolian group who migrated from Western China between the Yangtze and Huanghe. Haokip suggests that based on the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang following his death, that Chhinlung could refer to the vast networks of caverns and gates built underground where he was buried. The linguistic study of Sinlung and khul further implies that Khulsinlung together means tomb or graveyard covered with stones, however further research is required into this claim.

Leaving China

According to K. S. Latourette, there were political upheavals in China in 210 B.C. when the dynastic rule was abolished and the whole empire was brought under one administrative system. Rebellions broke out and chaos reigned throughout the Chinese state. Joshi argues that the Mizos left China as part of one of those waves of migration.

Anthropologist B. Lalthangliana traces the origins of the Mizo people to northwestern China, particularly the Gansu region along the Yellow River valleys. Historical records, including the Shi Ji (Historical Records), Hou Han Shu (Book of the Later Han), and Xin Tang Shu (New Book of Tang), suggest that the ancestors of the Tibeto-Burman groups descended from the Di-Qiang people, who lived in the Yellow River valleys over 7,000 years ago. Two major migrations of the Di-Qiang people contributed to the spread of Tibeto-Burman groups:

• First Migration (3000 B.C. – 2000 B.C.): Triggered by population growth due to agricultural abundance.

• Second Migration (1st century - 6th century A.D.): Driven by warfare and political instability.

The ancestors of the Mizos and other Tibeto-Burman groups are identified as the Qiang (Chinese: 羌; pinyin: Qiāng; Wade–Giles: Ch'iang. The Qiang were said to have been established in the western areas of Sichuan, Shanxi and Gansu. They were neighbours to the Shang dynasty, where their diplomacy was characterised as warlike, consisting of raids, looting and kidnapping for human sacrifice. One branch travelled south towards Burma and formed the modern Tiobeto-Burman groups. Vumson argues that the Tanguts formed from the Qiang people were forced southwards by Chinese expansion at an early stage. This was argued as of the Tibeto-Burman languages, only Tibetans maintained a written script, indicating that civilisation did not penetrate them before around the time of the Zhou dynasty. The absence of the influence of Buddhism indicates that by the first century A.D., the Tibeto-Burman ancestors of the Mizos had shifted their villages away from its influence.

In analysing Chinese history, Verghese and Thanzawna argue that based on religious beliefs of the Mizos, there was a lot in common with the Huns, Saks, Scythians and other slaves who were made to work on the Great Wall. The legend of a Mizo written language on scripture being devoured by a dog is likened to the possibility of referring to the destruction and burnings of scrolls, books and documents recorded on bamboo and palm leaves as ordered by Emperor Qin Shi Huang. K.S. Latourette states that the Chinese in their early dynasties believed in spirits in nature such as rivers, mountains, stars and other natural objects. They further believed that there were two souls, one in the flesh and another ascended higher. The Tarars during this period believed in a God known as Nagitay who watches over children cattle and Crops. Verghese and Thanzawna argue that Nagitay and Pathian are similar as being a one true God with dominion over earth but not interfering in mortal lives. The Mizo people also traditionally believed in two souls (Thlarau). Mizo animism believed in the prevalence of spirits in natural objects and an afterlife known as mitthi khua and pialral. Hence due these similarities it is argued that the Tibeto-Burman ancestors of the Mizos had contact with the Huns and Tartars to develop such religious beliefs.

The Mizos maintained an animist religion upon leaving China. This indicates that the migration from Chhinlung occurred before the introduction and adoption of Buddhism in the first century. By the 6–8th century it was assumed that the Mizos were in the Chamdo area of Tibet and moved further south during the rule of Empree Wu Zetian. This is argued as there is no influence of Nestorian Christianity in the influence of Mizo religion.

Genetics

Genetic studies have explored the origins of the Mizo people. Research indicates that the Mizo, along with other Kukish-speaking groups, have East Asians and Southeast Asians genetic markers. A study published in Genome Biology in 2004 found that the Y-DNA haplotypes of Mizo men were distinctly East and Southeast Asian. The Mizo people typically exhibit physical features common among East and Southeast Asian populations.

History

Shan States

The Zo tribes arrived in the Shan States for the first time in the fifth century. When they arrived there from Chhinlung or China, the Shans had already established themselves firmly in their States. The Shans did not accept the Mizos as guests but did not exclude them either. Before relocating to the Kabaw Valley in the 8th century, the Mizos had resided in the Shan States for almost 300 years. Thanga argues that the Mizos during this period settled in the Hukawng Valley. According to oral history, the Mizos had a famine known as Thingpui Tam during their stay in the Shan states. However, the Mizos were stated to have prospered with the exchange of culture with the Tai Shan states including learning the art of war and use of iron implements and moulding of brass pipes. Hranglien Songate argues that the Mizos developed their great festivals from the influence of the Tai Shan states and their culture.

During the 8th century the emergence of a Zo kingdom was evidenced in Chinese records. Fan Chuo a Tang dynasty administrator who published the Man Shu (simplified Chinese: 蛮书; traditional Chinese: 蠻書; pinyin: mánshū; lit. 'barbarian document'; roughly means the book on the southern tribes) records a kingdom on the Chindwin which the Chinese refer to as Mi-No. Zou argues the document refers to the Chindwin people living south of the Nanzhao Kingdom. In the Chinese text, the people are termed as Mi No, the Chinese name of the Chindwin and hence comparable to Chin. The Mi-No were stated to have been victims of Nanzhao's conquests in Western Yunnan. The kingdom was described as calling their princes and chiefs Shou. The structures lacked inner or outer walls but the Mi-No king possessed a palace of pillars and gold and silver. In 835 A.D. the Nanzhao invaded the Mi-No and looted their gold and silver. Due to the lack of distinct cultural identities, Zou argues that the Chinese scholars simply demarcated the Zo people as the Shou or Mi-No of the Chindwin. Due to the pressure of the Nanzhao, Tibet and China, the Zo migrated southwards towards the Irrawaddy River and settled deeper in Burma by the 9th century. The title of Shou resembles the term sho used by the Chins in the plains regions to designate themselves. Furthermore, Sing Khaw Khai argues that the pillars of the Mi-No king were ancestral pillars erected by the Tedim in the middle of their courtyards for ancestor sacrifices.

Fan Chuo did not specify the location of the Mi-No palace, instead indicating it is 60 days stages south west of Yung-Ch'ang (Pao Shan) in Nanzhao which is now situated between the Salween River and Mekong River. The directions would thus indicate towards the Kale and Kabaw valleys. Since Khampat in the Kabaw valley was established in the mid-9th century, according to Lalthangliana, it is more likely that the Zo lived under a Kale ruler. The Kale Valley was populated with a variety of tribes ranging from Sak, Kantu, Kaget, Kadu, Ingye, Kwan-yi, Shan etc. Despite being walled, Sing Khaw Khai argues that a succeeding Shan ruler built walls after the original rulers were conquered.

Arrived at Kabaw Valley, present-day Myanmar (Burma)

It was in the Kabaw Valley that Mizos had cultural influence with the local Burmans. It is conceivable that the Mizos learned the technique of cultivation from the Burmans at Kabaw as many of their agricultural implements bore the prefix Kawl, a name given by the Mizos to the Burmese. Some agricultural tools with the kawl prefix are: kawlhnam, kawlhrei, kawltu, kawlbahra, kawlhai, kawlthei, kawlfung, kawlhren and kawlper, etc. The influence of Burmese culture is also indicated by similaries in early games, musical instruments, dresses, and customs. Lalrimawia argues that traditions such as throwing of quoits, gauntlet, wrestling, merry-go-round and inkawlvar were aspects influenced by Burmese culture or interactions.

The Mizos began to migrate further down via the Chindwin river. However, the earliest Tibeo-Burman settlers, the Kadu tribes had already established themselves along the upper portions of the Irrawady valley. The Kadu in Manipur were in conflict with the Kadu in Burma as the Mizos occupied the Chindwin valley. Furthermore the Kadu's desire to settle the Chindwin stopped the Mizos from further migration East or West. For this reason, the Mizos contained themselves in the Kabaw Valley. Lalthangliana argues that the Mizos and the Burmese cohabited in Khampat against the Kadu tribes. An informal alliance was formed where the Burmese would not go beyond the Monywa and Alon in the Chindwin area, hence why the Mizos and Burmese did not have conflicts in this period. The Burmese instead migrated north to Myedu and Khetthin, where the Mizos were not inhabiting. As a result, the Mizo-Burmese alliance lasted from the 9th century to the 13th century. The Burmese fought their way through the various tribes such as the Mon, Wa, Sak, Kantu but never the Zo. Luce argues that the Zo were termed Khyang (ally) by the Burmese and left them with possession of most of the Chindwin. Lehman however argues against this by stating that linguistic identity and ethnic identity don't respond neatly. This alliance and interaction were responsible for the cultural exchange. Lalthangliana notes that the Mizo language developed and borrowed significant loan words from the Burmese language. The Burmese origin words were absorbed into the Mizo language and considered core features rather than loan words. The Mizos also maintained a tattooing practice which is attributed to a Burmese introduced custom. The strongest legacy of Mizo-Burman relations are musical instruments. In particular, the brass gongs and drums, which were treated as heirlooms, were originally Burmese. Copper hairpins and similar heirlooms are assumed to be Burmese descended as the Mizos were largely isolated from foreigners and did not have access to copper mines. The cotton gin of the Mizo villages are also of a similar model to the Burmese and began in use during the settlements in the Kabaw valley.

Khampat in the Kabaw Valley (now in Myanmar) is known to have been the next Mizo settlement. The area claimed by the Mizos as their earliest town was encircled by an earthen rampart and divided into several parts. The residence of the ruler stood at the central block called Nan Yar (Palace Site). The construction of the town indicates the Mizos had already acquired considerable architectural skills. They are said to have planted a banyan tree at Nan Yar before they left Khampat as a sign that the town was made by them. The reason for leaving Khampat is not known but the Banyan tree was planted with the belief that they would return to Khampat when the branches reached the ground. It is speculated that either the Shans or the Manipuri were responsible for their departure.The population of the migration was exemplified in oral history which recounts how when the Mizos departed Khampat, they walked over two clusters of bamboo which was reduced to dust. According to the Cheitharol Kumbaba, the Meitei and Pongs (Shans) had a common enemy known as the Kyang of Kapo. Zou argues that the Kyang of Kapo refers to the Khyan (Chin) of the Chindwin Basin. The Cheitharon Kumbababa states:

"[King Kiyamba] was victorious over the Kyangs of Kapo. Meetingu Kyampa and Choupha Khekkhompa, the king of Pong, made an alliance and fought (against the Kyangs). ... They attacked together Kyang Khampat of Kapo. They defeated Kyang. Captured in battle Mung of Takhen, Khamset, Khamkhai and Hokham."

The Meitei and the Shans divided the occupation of the Kabaw Valley among themselves. The Mizos through oral history maintained two hla regarding the legend of the banyan tree:

Mizo:

Ka phunbungpui dawi ai ka sanna, Mi Khawih loh, as khawih loh turin, Thangin lian la, khuanuleng hualin, I tang zar Piallei a zam tikah, Seifaten vangkhua rawn din leh nang
English:
Our Banyan tree has the power to predict Harm caused wither by men or animals could not inflict it Cause it thrives under the protection of Supreme being That shall be time to restore

Our Principal town as times before

— History of Mizo in Burma, Lalthangliana

Mizo:

Chhak tianga kan sulhnu, Chumchi leng romei a kai chiai e, Kan khaw Bungpui a tha her liai e, Kan khaw Bungpui a that her liai e, A tang zaran kulva kawl leng maw?
English:
The relic of our past in the east is still standing With a golden halo around it in misty setting The Banyan tree would look more majestic If there are lovely birds frolicking

Aren't they?

— History of Mizo in Burma, Lalthangliana

After reaching present-day Khampat in the Kabaw Valley of Myanmar, the Mizos established themselves there. According to L.H. Songate, they started the system of a chieftainship. Three chiefs (Hmar: Reng) were chosen by the Hmar King (Hmar: Rengpui) Chawnmanga to lead his realm. Chawnmanga then gave Lersia authority over the kingdom's southern region, Zingthlova over its northern region, and Luopuia over its central region. Then split to three kingdoms that later became chiefdoms.

King Lersia Chawngthu (c. 920–970 A.D.) was considered one of the greatest Kings of the Mizo people, as he established trade with the Shans and Burmans, with his kingdom spanning 40,000 miles.

In the Kabaw Valley, the Mizos and Shans were cooperative due to the common enemity of the Kadu people. Around this time from the 10–13th centuries, the Mizos developed musical instruments. Instruments such as the drum and gong were adopted most likely from the Burmese. It is argued that the Mizos left the Kabaw valley in the 13th century after Thai-Shan tribes invaded Assam in 1229 and the Mongol Empire conquered China, leading to an influx of Shans into the region. In accordance with the Mongol conquest of Burma, Kublai Khan had penetrated the Irrawady Valley down to South Mandaly. Since the Mizos did not adopt a written language or script it is extrapolated by historians that the Mizos did not encounter Kublai Khan's armies and avoided contact with the expedition routes taken. The Mongols replaced the successors of the Nanzhao kingdom and contributed to rise of ancestors of the Tai-speaking modern Shan. The power vacuum left after the withdrawal of the Mongol Empire empowered militant Shan states to begin expansion campaigns in Burma. This would ultimately push the Zo westwards into the Chin Hills.

Chin Hills

The Mizos arrived in the Chin Hills around the 13th century in successive waves of migration. Their movement southward has been linked to the expansion of Tai-Shan states (Tagaung, Mogaung, Mohnyin, Wuntho, Homalin, Kale, Bahmo, Putai and Khamti), as well as a joint Manipuri invasion of the Kabaw Valley with the Pong kingdom. The rugged highland terrain limited large urban settlements, leading to the formation of small, distinct village communities with unique socio-cultural identities. Over time, the lack of communication between settlements led to the emergence of different dialects, clothing styles, and customs. The ancestors of the Mizos split into two groups. One group passed the tributary of the Chindwin River and established Didim (Tiddim). The tribes in this first group consist of Meitei, Ralleng, Mirawng, Thado, Paihte, Zo and others to settle on the southern borders of Manipur. The second group[ moved to the southeastern side. The group halted at Thang Tlang where tribes such as Ngon, Lente, Tlaichhun and Zagiat settled down. The rest of the second group continued where the tribes of Laizo, Zauhan, Khuangli and Thlan Rawng settled on the southern side of Lentlang. Mattu and Mara tribes settled in the southern corner neighbours the tribes of the Arakan Hills.

In tracing the migration of the tribes, Zawla purports that there were three stages. The tribes originally halted at Le Tlang or Imbuk Tlang. The tribes then moved south towards the Tiddim area and further south towards Falam. The Sukte and the Siyin tribes of Falam forced the tribes to halt further migrations, as a result the Mizos crossed the Manipur river and occupied Leng Tlang. It is estimated the Mizos lived in Len Tlang within a range of 200–400 years according to varying historians.

Seipui, one of the chiefdoms that lasted till the 1700s, was strategically located with natural defenses and year-round water sources. It was 20 miles west from Falam and contained ancient stone monuments, speculated to have been erected by the Lusei clan of the Mizo people. In regards to prominent settlements in the Chin Hills, the Lusei tribes mainly settled at Seipui and Khawkawk. The Ralte settled at Suaipui and Saihmun. The Chawngthu clan settled Sanzawl and Bochung. The Khiangte at Pelpawl, Belmual and Lungchhuan. The Hauhnar, Chuaungo and Chauhang settled in the Hauhnar hills. The Ngente, Phunte and Parte at Chawnghawih and Sialllam. The Pautu and Khawlring settled in the namesake locations of the Pautu Hills and Khawlring Hills.

By the late 16th century, the Luseis at Seipui engaged in conflict with tribes who resided east of the Manipur River. These wars led to the capture of Chhuahlawma, a Paite warrior. Chhuahlawma was adopted by his captors and given a wife. His son, Zahmuaka, would later become the first Lusei chief, marking the beginning of Lusei chieftainship in Mizo history.

Moved westwards toward the Lushai Hills

A typical Mizo village during the early 1900s

In the early 14th century, they moved westward to Indo-Burmese border into the Lushai Hills. They built villages and called them by their clan names such as Seipui, Saihmun, Bochung, Biate, Vangchhia, etc. The hills and difficult terrains of Chin Hills forced division into several villages and ethnic diaspora arose.

Historical settlements and distribution of Mizo Tribes and Clans in Mizoram State.

Establishment of chieftainship

Main article: Mizo Chieftainship

The origins of Mizo chieftainship can be traced back to Zahmuaka and his sons, who established the earliest ruling clans. These included the Zadeng, Thangluaha, Thangura, Paliana, Rivunga, and Rokhuma families. The Zadeng chieftains were among the first to migrate, reaching as far as the Chittagong Hill Tracts. Subsequent migrations followed, with the Palian clan moving next, succeeded by the Rokhuma, Rivung, and Thangluaha clans.

By 1890, following the British annexation of the Lushai Hills, colonial records documented the status of these ruling families. The Rokhuma chieftains were assimilated into the predominant Sailo house, leaving little historical trace beyond oral tradition. The Zadeng, Thangluaha, and Palian houses, once powerful, were significantly weakened under British rule, retaining authority over only a few settlements under colonial protection. Meanwhile, Rivung chiefs settled near the Twipra Kingdom, becoming the first Lushai leaders recorded in historical sources as early as 1777. The Thangura house, later known as the Sailo clan, emerged as the most influential ruling group, consolidating power over much of the Lushai Hills frontier..

Selesih

Main article: Selesih

Selesih was one of the largest and most renowned settlements of the Mizo clans. This settlement was formed around 1720 with the cooperation of seven chiefs who sought to defend against raids from tribes across the Tiau River. Sailova's sons Chungnunga and Lianlula, with their sons, established Selesih, which was originally a settlement under Pu Kawlha. The coalition consisted of Lalhlume, Rona, Lalchera, Pu Kawlha, Darliankula and Darpuiliana. The settlement, with a population estimated to be between 50,000 and 100,000, housed approximately 7,000 homes, making it one of the most prosperous and populous settlements in ancient Mizoram. In terms of modern-day Mizoram, it was situated between Khawbung South and Zawlsei in Champhai district.

Spoken by the Sailo clan, the Lusei dialect emerged as the dominant form of speech within the settlement. As the settlement expanded and mingled with neighbouring clans, the Lusei dialect gained prominence and eventually became the cornerstone of the modern Mizo language.

Early Lushai Chiefs Family Tree
Zahmuaka Zadeng Rivunga Thangura Palliana Rokhuma Thangluaha Thangmanga Chawnglula Chenkhuala Sailova Chungnunga Lianlula Lalhlume Rona Lalchera Pu Kawlha Darliankuala Darpuiliana Laltuaka Lallula Rolura Savunga Lalpuiliana Lallianvunga Mangpawrha Vuta Lalngura Lalzika Lalbuta Lalsavunga Ngura Suakpuilala Vanhnuailiana Vanlalpuia

Lallula

Main article: Lallula

Chief Lallula left the settlement of Selesih to establish Zopui. Lallula consolidated his power by invading the Ralte settlement of Siakeng and overpowering its chief, known as Mangngula. The Khawlhrings, who were harassed by the Haka tribes, also fled to Lallula's settlement of Zopui. His power would grow and challenge the Zahau clan known as the Thlang Rawng. The Thlang Rawng continued to harass, raid and demand tributes. Lallula hence concocted a plan to end Zahau domination in the Lushai Hills.

Lallula invited the Thlang Rawng chief Thanchhuma to give him tribute and arrange a feast for him. Thanchhuma arrived with a delegation of his upas and his champion pasalṭha, Thanghlianga. The delegates were fed zu and intoxicated. At midnight Lallula beat a gong to signal the ambush. The delegation was killed by the villagers and warriors and Thanchhuma was captured. His pasaltha Thanghlianga escaped to tell the news. Thanchhuma was humiliated and Lallula immortalized the tale in a hla (song). To avoid reprisal, Lallula migrated westwards away from the Thlang Rawng.

North-South War

The North-South War (Lushai: Chhim Leh Hmar Indo) was a war between two factions of the Sailo family. Lallula's descendants were established in the North with his son Vuta. In the South, the descendants of Lallula's cousin, Rolura (son of Cherra), were led by Chief Lalpuithanga.

Tensions began when Vuta began to settle further South in Buanhmun. Vuta established a temporary hut to establish a village around. Lalpuithanga in retaliation moved and settled in Buanhmun. However, Vuta did not hesitate from settling in Buanhmun, leading to Lalpuithanga to leave the settlement back to his hometown of Vanchengte. Vuta as a result of Lalpuithanga's retreat composed a mocking hla (song). This humiliated Lalpuithanga and led to an escalation of tensions between Northern and Southern chiefs.

Vuta, at one point, had to retrieve a gun, his prized possession, which Lalpuithanga had taken. He took his nephew, Thawmvunga, who was a renowned pasalṭha with him. Lalpuithanga's upas were former members of the Zadeng chiefs that Vuta and the northern chiefs had subdued, in revenge they planned to ambush Vuta. Each of them concealed a stick and Lalpuithanga confronted Vuta about the composition of the song. Vuta claimed to mean different lyrics in an attempt to diffuse the situation. However, his nephew Thawmvunga was angered and swung his dao around above the heads of the delegates to subdue them. Thawmvunga took the gun from them and left with Vuta. Lalpuithanga's upas chased down Vuta and Thawmvunga and attempted to wrestle the gun away from them. In the ensuing chaos, Thawmvunga took out his knife and attempted to saw off the gun and took off. As they ran, Lalpuithanga's men shot a volley at Vuta and Thawmvunga which missed but signalled a declaration of war.

The war led to constant raids between the North and South chiefs. The war led to the Khawlung massacre, a brutal raid in the middle of the night which became immortalized as a song. Many women and children were taken captive. The war ceased with the onset of the mautam famine.

Old Tualte

The exact date of Tualte's establishment remains uncertain, though its earliest recorded acknowledgement dates back to 1861. At that time, it comprised approximately 1,000 households and supported a substantial population. Tualte was home to several prominent figures in Mizo history, including Pasalṭha Vana Pa (Thangzachhinga), Chawngduma, Zampuimanga, Keikawla, and Tawkthiala, among others. Unlike settlements such as Selesih, which were governed by multiple chiefs, Tualte operated under the singular authority of Vanhnuailiana, whose father, Lalsavunga, was among the wealthiest chiefs in Mizo history. The decline of Tualte coincided with the devastating impact of the mauṭam famine.

Lushai Expedition

Main article: Lushai Expedition

On 31 December 1871, a village in Cachar was raided by 200 Lushai warriors with 25 villagers killed and 37 taken prisoner. The same day, a tea estate in Alexandrapur was destroyed in a joint raid of Chief Savunga and Chief Bengkhuaia. James Winchester who was visiting with his five year old daughter Mary Winchester was visiting the estate when the raid occurred. He was killed by the warriors and his daughter was taken captive. The rescue of Mary Winchester prompted outrage and encouraged a punitive expedition into the Lushai Hills.

Two columns were established. The Chittagong (Southern) column and the Cachar (Northern) column. The Cachar Column defeated the villages of Pawibawia after attempting to cross his territory, leading him to side with Lalburha, the target of the expedition. The force occupied his village of Sellam but failed to secure his submission, preferring to continue towards Lalburha.

Tomb of Chief Vanhnuailiana during the Expedition, photographed by R.G. Woodthorpe

On 17 February 1872, the Cachar Column entered Lalburha's village which had been besieged and abandoned. Lalburha had been attacked by the Sukte tribes and successfully defended with heavy losses. He deserted the village and had burnt many buildings to the ground. Only the tomb of Vanhnuailiana had been untouched and investigated. The Cachar column made peace with Lalburha's mother, Rolianpuii in a neighbouring village and returned to Cachar.

The Chittagong Column focussed on punishing Savunga and Bengkhuaia. The force fought with Vanlula who refused to let the force cross his territory, leading to his village being overrun and Vanlula burning it down. T.H. Lewin's ally, Rothangpuia joined the force but was not able to be used diplomatically due to bad history with the Sailo and Howlongs. Rothangpuia however was influential via marriage to the northern Howlong chiefs. Lewin assigned Subadar Mohamed Azim of the Chittagong Frontier Police to accompany Rothangpuia to negotiate the release of Mary Winchester under Bengkhuaia and to free the other captives to avoid an attack. Mary Wincester was recovered safely and negotiations began with the two chiefs. On 29 January 1872, the Chiefs agreed to submit to the column and release all captives from the raids. In February, Lewin facilitated an oath of friendship with Bengkhuaia and Savunga. Lalburha who had avoided the Northern Column submitted to Lewin as well.

East-West Wars

The East-West War was a conflict between two descendant factions of Lallula beginning in 1873. It concerned the western chiefs in the family of Suakpuilala and the eastern chiefs in the family of Vanhnuailiana. Tensions had been raised due to Suakpuilala's son, Khalkam, desiring the hand of Tuali, who was to be betrothed to Vanhnuialiana's son Liankhama. Lalzika, a chief with vengeance for being denied Suakpuilala's sister, Banaitangi joined Liankhama in the war. The war lasted until 1867.

The East-West War erupted once more due to closely settling villages and disputing claims to jhum sites. Suakpuilala's son, Lianphunga cooperated with Lalzika in raiding the village of Pugrying. Khalkam also entered into a dispute with Pawibawia. The western coalition consisted of Suakpuilala, Khalkam and Lianphunga while the eastern coalition consisted of Liankhama, Lalburha and Pawibawia. The war ended in 1881 with the onset of the mautam famine. Pawibawia, Khalkam and Lalhleia met and made peace and agreed to procure food together from Cachar.

Anti-Sailo Rebellion

The Anti-Sailo Rebellion (Lushai: Mizo all sawi) was a movement of the Mizo people to dethrone their chiefs. The rebellion began in the Eastern Lushai Hills in the village of Vuta's son, Lalkhama. In the village of Hmawngkawn, ruled by Chief Vanphunga, the villagers rounded him up with his upas and made them hold burning firebrands in their hands. They took the hostages and made them extinguish the firebrand in a water trough, making the chief recite that his chieftainship is extinguished and the upas that they will never align or support the chief ever again.

Vuta's son began to lose their authority over their people as they continued to be desthroned. Vanphunga fled to the western chief Lianphunga to restore order and to take anything he wanted as compensation. Lianphunga arrived at Hmawngkawn with Lalhluma where they were threatened to not enter unless they would be shot. Lalhluma declared his name and stepped over the entrance where one shot was made but missed him. The individuals surrendered and accepted chieftainship, hence ending the Anti-Sailo rebellion and restoring the rule of the dethroned chiefs.

Chin-Lushai Expedition

Main article: Chin-Lushai Expedition

In 1888, Lieutenant John Fraser Stewart was assigned to survey the Rangamati border for road construction. Stewart was granted a party of sepoys to accompany him. On 3 February 1888, Stewart and his party were attacked by 200-300 Mizo warriors. Stewart fought back but was wounded in the chest by a bullet and died instantly. Stewart's body was recovered in bamboo with his head missing.

An investigation revealed Chief Hausata had been ordered by his father-in-law to bring him heads as an apology to a martial dispute. Hence Stewart's unguarded encampment was an opportune raid. Within 10 days of the murder of Captain Stewart, a British allied chief, Pakuma Rani, was raided by Vuta's sons, Nikama, Lunliana and Kairuma. Furthermore, the village in the Chengri Valley was raided by Lianphunga and his brother Zahrawka, leading to the death of 101 villagers and the capture of 91 individuals.

The Lushai Expedition of 1888 was arranged against Hausata. However, intelligence from Darbili, a British ally, revealed that Hausata had already died and been buried with Stewart's gun with the heads of the party given to another chief known as Paona. When the column arrived at Hausata's village, the Lushais burned it down and deserted it.The guides identified Hausata's house and located his grave. Underneath Hausata's robed body was Stewart's gun. Another expedition arranged against Lianphunga was organized. However, when one column under Daly made contact with Lianphunga, he felt unfit to perform an arrest and allowed Lianphunga to return to his village in promise to cooperate with Skinner who was arriving soon. As a result, Lianphunga fled the settlement.

Lushai Rising

Main article: Lushai Rising

The Chin-Lushai Expedition annexed the Lushai Hills and the Chin Hills and established several outposts. Captain Herbert Richard Browne was assigned political officer of the North-Lushai Hills. His first decision was to depose Lianphunga and Zahrawka of their chieftainship. However, new British policies on taxes and hunting restrictions led Khalkam to break his oath of fealty. Khalkam held a meeting with his brothers and plotted a revolt against British occupation.

On 9 September 1890, Captain Browne was ambushed on his journey between Aizawl and Changsil. Browne was stabbed in the arm with three severe wounds and excessive bleeding. Browne died 15 minutes after bring brought to Changsil post. Khalkam subsequently besieged Fort Aijal and overran the British. A relief force was dispatched to relieve Fort Aijal and Changsil. The force provided 200 men of the Surma Valley Military police under A.C. Tytler and Liuetenant R.R. Swinton. However, while navigating the river, the party was ambushed and Swinton was killed in action. Browne's successor, R.B. McCabe, was successful in curbing the resistance and secured Khalkam's surrender on 23 November. Khalkam, Lianphunga and Thanghula were sent to Hazaribagh jail, where the former two committed suicide.

Later on in 1892, Chief Zakapa revolted against the British. The investigation showed that superintendent of the South Lushai Hills, Charles Stewart Murray had demanded two girls as sexual companions for himself and his assistant Mr Taylor. After failing to procure women, Murray threatened his wife would be taken from him to fulfil the demand. Zakapa left and stayed with Lalthuama. Murray interrupted the meeting and in private conversation reiterated the demands. After the conversation, Murray began to burn down the rice stock of the village by setting the granary on fire. The Lushais became hostile and fired upon Murray and his party. Murray escaped leaving behind his money, guns, and men. On 16 March, 1892 C.S. Murray was removed as superintendent and replaced with John Shakespear. Zakapa's allies were captured but liberally treated.

McCabe would visit Lalburha's village who had refused to supply 100 coolies. The British column occupied the village which led to Lalburha burning down the houses and trapping them. However the British maintained their volley and scattered the attackers. The operations against Lalburha would last from 3 March 1892 - 17 March 1892. Lalburha fled into exile as a fugitive as a result. Lalburha's ally, Pawibawia was captured on 14 April after storming his village at a climb over 2000 feet. After the capture of all Eastern Lushai chiefs by 8 June 1892, the chiefs agreed to pay house tax and supply coolies to the British.

Colonial Era

Main article: British rule in the Lushai Hills

The Mizo people under British rule experienced the establishment of Fort Aijal now Aizawl. Captain Granville Henry Loch expanded the fort and built roads, the parade ground, and permanent stone structures as opposed to temporary thatched shelters. The colonial era saw the arrival of Welsh Presbyterian Missionaries, most famously James Herbert Lorrain and Frederick William Savidge who were funded by the Arthington Aborigines Mission. Lorrain and Savidge discovered that the Mizos lacked a writing system and spent four years learning the Mizo language. In 1898, they introduced the Mizo alphabet via the roman script. The Mizos experienced the mautam famine once more but this time as British subjects. The British government began to incentivise hunting down the rat population and distributed food relief. Food was distributed as a loan to be repaid with money or labour in the future. The labourers were used to develop Aizawl into a city by building new infrastructure, instutitons and waterworks. The church in Mizoram also distributed food and guaranteed loans for Mizos to procure food and took in orphans. In this period, there was a rise in Christianity among the Mizo people.

In World War One, 2000 Mizo men were marched out into the 27th Indian Labour Corps under four companies. After World War One, the interwar period saw the first attempts at political representation under Telela Ralte but were suppressed by Superintendent Neville Edward Parry. In 1931, Major Anthony Gilchrist McCall was assigned superintendent of the Lushai Hills and introduced significant reforms. He formed the ten point code, the village welfare committee system, the chief's durbar and invested into the development of the Lushai Hills cottage industry. These reforms were introduced to prepare the tribes into being formed into a new crown colony but was dropped with the onset of World War II.

In World War Two, Superintendent Anthony McCall implemented the Total Defence Scheme (TDS) to combat the Japanese advance into India. He secured the loyalty of 300 chiefs and made an oath with them to the Union Jack. In 1944, the British formed the Lushai Scouts under Major Jack Longbottom to be part of V Force.

The first political party the Mizo Union (originally, Mizo commoners union) was founded on 12 April 1946 by R. Vanlawma. The Mizo Union faced internal rivalry in the direction of the political future of the Mizo people. The Mizo Union's left wing focused on membership into the Indian Union. The Mizo Union Right Wing advocated for alternative political directions such as the Professor Coupland Crown Colony scheme to carve out a British colony for the hill tribes until self-determination. The Mizo people would develop their second party, the United Mizo Freedom Organisation, which would largely advocate for a union with Burma. However, the UMFO would lack the support it needed to prevent joining the Indian Union.

Post-Independence India

The Mizo people did not celebrate the Indian Independence Day and no Indian flags were hoisted. This was because rival factions of the Mizo Union threatened violence if a celebration of Indian integration were to be carried out.

The Mizo Union abolished chieftainship in 1954. The same year, the Lushai Hills were renamed to the Mizo district.

Mizo National Front uprising

Main article: Mizo National Front uprising

The mautam famine took place once more in 1959. The Mizo National Famine Front was formed and distributed food relief while spreading nationalist messages and campaigning on the slogan "Mizoram for Mizos". On 28 October 1961, the MNFF transitioned into a political party and was rechristened as the Mizo National Front.

On 1 March 1966, the Mizo National Front, led by Laldenga, declared independence from India. The MNF launched Operation Jericho, which targeted the posts of the Assam Rifles, the Aizawl treasury and other key buildings. The Indian Government responded with the bombing of Aizawl. On 5 March 1966, the bombing of Aizawl saw the aerial firing of a water reservoir at Tuikhuahtlang. Further incendiary bombs saw the destruction of circuit houses and the burning down of buildings.

Culture and society

Main article: Mizo culture

The Mizo culture is diverse and rich due to the various tribes and clans. After the 19th century, it has been heavily based on Christianity—the main festival of the Mizos is Christmas, or locally known as Krismas. Despite valuing traditional practices and culture, many aspects have undergone changes with westernization. Recently there have been attempts to revive traditional practices such as Chapchar Kut.

Language

Main article: Mizo language

The modern Mizo people speak the Mizo language, a member of the Kuki-Chin languages in the Tibeto-Burman language family group. Mizo is one of the official languages of Mizoram, along with English. Like the Chinese language, Mizo is a tonal language. There are four tones, high, low, rising and falling.

Writing system

It is commonly believed that Mizoram and the Mizo people lacked a writing system before the arrival of the British, though this claim is only partially accurate. Mizo folklore recounts a tale of a lost script once written on parchment. According to the legend, the parchment was consumed by a mad hound, leaving the Mizo people without a script for much of their history. While these are myths and not verifiable historical facts, they have sparked speculation among historians about the story's origin. Some historians suggest the tale was never intended to be taken literally; instead, the "mad hound" might symbolize a foreign ruler or authoritative figure who invaded the Mizos and destroyed their records. This aligns with historical accounts of invading forces erasing the cultural and intellectual heritage of the conquered. For example, the Meitei people (Manipuris) recount the burning of the Puyas—their religious texts—by a Hindu king, illustrating a similar pattern of cultural erasure.

Currently, in Mizoram, the Roman script is used to write the Mizo language using the Hunterian transliteration. The Mizo language can be read by 91.3% of the population of Mizoram, making the state to have the highest literacy rates in India and the first at 100% in 2025.

Art and Craft

Main article: Mizo craft

Handloom and handicraft exhibition at Aizawl, Mizoram.

A wide range of art and craft products are sold at Mizoram's markets. The main subset of craftwork is textiles, bamboo, cane, and basketry. Many women engage in weaving and basketry. The most common bamboo products are khumbeu (a cap), tea tray, cane bag, tea coaster and brooms. Outside of bamboo products, Mizoram is well known for traditional dresses weaved from local artisans such as the puan which now introduces silk into its design.

Cuisine

Main article: Mizo cuisine

Traditionally, most non-vegetarian dishes among the Mizos were served on banana leaves, reflecting a rich and distinctive culinary heritage. Mustard oil was commonly used in cooking, along with ingredients such as garlic, ginger, and chilli—though overall, Mizo cuisine tends to be milder than that of many other regions. Rice is the staple food, typically accompanied by both vegetarian and non-vegetarian curries. Bamboo shoots are often used to impart a distinct aroma to many dishes.

The most typical Mizo dish is bai which is mixed vegetables combined with fermented pork fat. There are over five different variations of preparing bai among the tribes of Mizoram.Certain traditional practices—such as serving food on banana leaves or the widespread use of bamboo shoots—are now largely reserved for special occasions rather than everyday meals.

Dance

Cheraw dance with traditional Mizo attire

Cheraw dance, also referred to as the bamboo dance, is considered to be the oldest dance of the Mizos, dating back until the 1st century while the Mizos were still in Chhinlung, China before their great migration. The dance is now performed in almost all festivals and occasions. Other dances include Chheih Lam, Khual Lam, Chai Lam, Tlang Lam, and Sarlamkai. Lam in Mizo means "dance."

Musical instruments

Main article: Music of Mizoram

Darkhuang, also known as Zamluang or Jamluang

Mizos have been using different musical instruments. They can broadly be divided into three: striking instruments, wind instruments, and stringed instruments.

• Striking instruments include the Khuang (drum), Dár (gong), Darkhuang/Zamluang (large brass drum), Darbu (three-note gong), Darmang (small gong) and Seki (hollow horns).
• Wind instruments include the Rawchhem (bagpipe-like instrument), Tumphit, Tawtawrawt (bamboo trumpet), Phenglawng (bamboo flute), and Hnahtum (leaf).
• Stringed instruments include the Ṭingṭang (pronounced treeng-trang, guitar), Lemlawi (harp), and Tuium Dar (three strings with unique notes each).

Khuang is the only Mizo traditional musical instrument that is popularly used in the present day. In the olden days, Khuang had no role in religious functions; but today, the use of Khuang is a must in every church service.

Traditional clothing

Main article: Mizo clothing

Mizo traditional attire showcased in the Mizoram State Museum.

A typical Mizo traditional attire for men comes with a big puan that varies colors, and different style of wearing it. They wear a shorter puan that are above the knees at the bottom. In order to protect themselves from the heat during the summer, they are often seen with clothing around their waists and a type of turban known as chawn on their heads.

There are numerous Mizo women's traditional outfits. The most popular one is the Puan. There are four types of Puan: Ngotekherh (puanhruih), Puanchei (Puanlaisen), Puanngo and Puanrin. The traditional blouse is called Kawrchei. It is hand woven from cotton stuff. When dancing, the blouse is frequently paired with puanchei. These have typically vivid colors and chequered patterns.

Marriage

Mizo marriage customs are deeply rooted in traditional practices, though they have evolved over time, especially with the influence of Christianity. The process typically begins with Mangkhawn, a formal proposal where the groom's family sends an elder, known as the "Palai," to the bride's home to ask for her hand in marriage. Once the proposal is accepted, the groom's family pays a bride price to the bride's family, a practice that underscores the social contract of marriage in Mizo society. The wedding ceremony includes the Buh-faak, a cherished rice-feeding ritual where the couple feeds each other, symbolising their commitment and promise to support each other. After the ceremony, the bride moves into the groom's house, marking her permanent entry into his family.

Tlawmngaihna

Tlawmngaihna (t͡lɔmŋaɪʔna) is a social code of conduct in Mizo culture that has no direct translation into English. It essentially means to be ethical, gracious, considerate, and helpful to others without thinking of yourself. A saying in the Mizo culture goes:

Sem sem dam dam,
ei bil thi thi"

which can be interpreted to:

Those who hoard will perish
but who shares will live"

This saying was important during the 1958 famine in the Mizo Hills. Another part of the Mizo's tlawmngaihna is the Nghah Loh Dawr shops. In Mizoram, it is quite typical to see sheds or small shops by the side of the road where vegetables and fruits are stored with signs stating the prices of things, but no merchant in sight. It is trusted that onlookers will pick up what they require and deposit the cash in a box. The customers are urged to assist themselves from the same container if they need to make a change. The shops operate under the tenet of trust.

Religion

Sakhua

Main article: Mizo religion

Sakhua (lit. "deity divine force"), also known as Mizo religion, or Khua worship, is a traditional polytheistic ethnic faith practiced by the Mizo people prior to the widespread adoption of Christianity during the British annexation of Mizoram.

Christianity

See also: Christianity in Mizoram

Mizo people were influenced by British missionaries in the 19th century, as the British Raj subjugated the chieftainship under its dominance, which they later abolished by Assam-Lushai District (Acquisition of Chief's Rights) Act, 1954. Christianity is the predominant faith in Mizoram. According to the 2001 census, 86.9% of the population identified as Christian.

Buddhism

Within the Mizo tribe, a very small minority practices Buddhism. According to the Joshua Project, approximately 0.16% of the Mizo Lushai people in India adhere to Buddhism.

Bnei Menashe

See also: Bnei Menashe

In the 19th century, European Christian missionary activity in the region led to conversion of some Chin, Kuki, and Mizo peoples. In the mid-to-late 20th century, a rather small number of Mizo and related ethnic peoples in Assam and Mizoram began practicing Judaism, after a community leader had a dream in 1951 that they were descendants of the biblical figure Manasseh, a lost tribe of Israel. They number, at most, several thousand in a population of more than 3.7 million in these states. Genetic studies have shown very low affinity with Middle Eastern peoples (including ethnic Jews), and rabbinic authorities in Israel have acknowledged Bnei Menashe people as Jews subsequent to their conversion to Judaism under normative Jewish practices. Several hundred have already emigrated to Israel, where they have been settled in the Israeli city of Sderot.

Calendar

Main article: Mizo calendar

The Mizo have their own calendars which is a lunar calendar. They have 12 months in a year. They are: Pawlkut Thla, Ramtuk Thla, Vau Thla, Ṭomir Thla, Nikir Thla, Vawkhniahzawn Thla, Thiṭin Thla/Thlazing/Thlado, Mimkut Thla, Khuangchawi Thla, Sahmulphah Thla and Pawltlak Thla.

Political, linguistic and economic situation

Main articles: Mizo district and Union Territory of Mizoram

After Indian independence, the democratic change in the administrative setup of Mizoram led to an anti-chief movement. The feeling was widespread against the autocratic chiefs and for the Mizo Union. In 1955, at a meeting of representatives of various Mizo villages held in Aizawl, the demand arose for a separate hills state. The local people felt they had been ill-served by the Assam Government during the Mautam famine.

When in 1960 the government introduced Assamese as the official language of the state, there were many protests against the Official Language Act of 1961. That was followed by the March 1966 Mizo National Front uprising, resulting in attacks on the military installations in Aizawl, Lunglei and other towns. The Mizo National Front, formerly known as Mizo National Famine Front, declared independence from India.

The Indian government designated Mizoram as a union territory on 21 January 1972. Laldenga, the president of the Mizo National Front, signed a peace accord in 1986 with the Government of India, stating Mizoram was an integral part of India. Pu Laldenga came to the ministry in the interim government, which was formed in coalition with Congress in 1987. The statehood of Mizoram was proclaimed on 20 February 1987.

Present demand for inclusion in the Eighth Schedule

With 91.58% literacy, the second highest of the Indian states, Mizoram is a leader in the national emphasis on education. That has made people demand for Mizo to be recognised as an official language in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution.

See also

• Mizo diaspora
• Mizo people in Myanmar
• Chhinlung
• Mizo name

Sources

• Alexander, Colin R (August 2019). Administering Colonialism and War: The Political Life of Sir Andrew Clow of the Indian Civil Service. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. p. 158. ISBN 9780199096954.
• Bapui, Vanlal Tluonga (30 November 2018). "Hmar Language and Identity". In Kumar, Rajesh; Prakash, Om (eds.). Language, Identity and Contemporary Society. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5275-2033-2. Retrieved 9 July 2025.
• Goswami, B.B (1979). The Mizo Unrest: A Study of Politicisation of Culture. Jaipur: Aalekh Publishers.
• Kamkhenthang, H. (1988). The Paite, a Transborder Tribe of India and Burma. Dehli: Mittal Publications. Retrieved 9 July 2025.
• Haokip, D.L. (2014). "The Tales Telling the Location of Sinlung-Khul:Origin of the Chin-Kuki-Mizo Zoumi". In Sudhir, H. (ed.). Tribal History of North-East India: Essay in Honour of Professor Lal Dena. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company. ISBN 978-93-5125-099-9. Retrieved 14 July 2025.
• Lalthangliana, B. (2006). Culture and Folklore of Mizoram. Aizawl: Publications Division Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. ISBN 978-81-230-2658-9.
• Lalthangliana, B. (1989). Mizo Lal Ropuite (in Mizo). Aizawl: R.T.M Press.
• Lianhmingthanga (1998). Material Culture of the Mizo. Mizoram: Tribal Research Institute.
• Liangkhaia, Reverend (1938). Mizo Chanchin (Mizo History) (in Mizo). Aizawl: L.T.L Publications. Retrieved 21 February 2025.
• McCall, Anthony Gilchrist (1949). Lushai Chrysalis. London: Luzac.
• Reid, Robert (1942). The Lushai Hills: culled from History of the frontier areas bordering on Assam from 1883-1941. Calcutta: Firma KLM.
• Nag, Sajal (2008). Pied Pipers in North-East India: Bamboo-flowers, Rat-famine and the Politics of Philanthropy. (1881-2007)=New Delhi. Manohar Publishers & Distributors. ISBN 978-81-7304-311-6.
• Nag, Sajal (April 2016). The Uprising: Colonial State, Christian Missionaries and Anti-Slavery Movement in North-East India (1908–1954). New Delhi: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-946089-2.
• Nag, Chitta Ranjan (1998). Mizo Polity and Political Modernisation. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
• Nunthara, C (1996). Mizoram: Society and Polity. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company. ISBN 81-7387-059-4.
• Parry, N.E; Hutton, J.E (1932). The Lakhers. London: Macmillan & Co, Limited. p. 1.
• Prakash, Ved (2008). Terrorism in india's Northeast: A Gathering Storm. India: Gyan Books. ISBN 978-81-7835-662-4. Retrieved 18 June 2025.
• Prasad, R N; Chakraborty, P; Sailo, Michael Lalrinsanga (2006). Administration of Justice in Mizoram. New Delhi: Mittal Publications. ISBN 81-8324-059-3.
• Reid, A.S. (1893). Chin-Lushai Land: Including a description of the various expeditions into the Chin-Lushai Hills and the final annexation of the country. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co.
• Samuelson, Ramchuani Sena (1985). Love Mizoram. Imphal: First Impression.
• Sen, Anandaroop (2022). "Insurgent Law: Bengal Regulation III and the Chin-Lushai Expeditions (1872-1898)" (PDF). Modern Asian Studies. 56 (1): 1515–1555. doi:10.1017/S0026749X21000366. Retrieved 18 December 2024.
• Shakespear, John (1912). The Lushei Kuki Clans. London: Macmillan and Co. LCCN 14000139. OCLC 574955962. OL 6563643M.
• Shakespear, L.W (1929). History of the Assam Rifles. London: Macmillan and Co, Limited.
• VanBik, Kenneth (2009). Proto-Kuki-Chin: A Reconstructed Ancestor of the Kuki-Chin Languages (PDF). California: University of California. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-944613-47-4. Retrieved 5 July 2025.
• Verghese, C.G.; Thanzawna, R.L. (1997). A History of the Mizos. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
• Lalrinfeli (1 July 2014). "Export Potential of Agricultural, Handloom and Handicrafts Products in Mizoram". In Verma, S.B. (ed.). Agricultural Marketing. New Delhi: Scientific Publsihers. ISBN 978-93-86102-95-9. Retrieved 9 July 2025.
• Vumson (1987). Zo History: With an introduction to Zo culture, economy, religion and their status as an ethnic minority in India, Burma and Bangladesh (PDF). Aizawl, Mizoram: Vumson. Retrieved 9 July 2025.
• Zorema, J. (2007). Indirect Rule in Mizoram: 1890-1954. New Delhi: Mittal Publications. ISBN 978-81-8324-229-5. OCLC 271837683. OL 48056042M.

• Murthy, B. Lalitha; Subbarao, K.V. (2 August 2011). "Lexical anaphors and pronouns in Mizo". In Lust, Barbara C.; Wali, Kashi; Gair, James W.; Subbarao, K.V.; de Gruyter, Walter (eds.). Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages: A Principled Typology. Berlin: Walter de Grurter GmbH & Co. KG. Retrieved 9 July 2025.

• Gogoi, Parismita; Kalita, Sishir; Lalhminglui, Wendy; Sarmah, Priyankoo; Prasanna, S.R.M. (22 September 2021). "Learning Mizo Tones from F0 Contours using 1D-CNN". In Karpov, Alexey; Potapova, Rodmonga (eds.). Speech and Computer:23 International Conference. Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-87802-3. ISSN 0302-9743. Retrieved 9 July 2025.

• Khiangte, Laltluanga, ed. (2017). Writings in Mizo Manuscripts (PDF). Aizawl: National Mission for Manuscripts. ISBN 978-93-80829-77-7. Retrieved 9 July 2025.

Journals

• Zarzoa, Lal (2014). "Traditional Religion of the Lusei (Mizo) Tribe in the Premodern Age". The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society. 4 (1). Granada: Common Ground Research Networks: 1–10. doi:10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v04i01/51079. Retrieved 13 January 2025.