Jump to content

Frank Close

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Francis Edwin Close)

Frank Close
Born
Francis Edwin Close

(1945-07-24) 24 July 1945 (age 80)
NationalityBritish
EducationThe King's School, Peterborough
Alma materUniversity of St Andrews
Magdalen College, Oxford
Scientific career
FieldsParticle physics
InstitutionsStanford University
Daresbury Laboratory
CERN
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
University of Oxford
Exeter College, Oxford
Doctoral advisorRichard Dalitz

Francis Edwin Close (born 24 July 1945) is a particle physicist who is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford.

Education

[edit]

Close was a pupil at King's School, Peterborough (then a grammar school), where he was taught Latin by John Dexter, brother of author Colin Dexter. He took a BSc in physics at St Andrews University graduating in 1967, before researching for a DPhil in theoretical physics at Magdalen College, Oxford, under the supervision of Richard Dalitz, which he was awarded in 1970. He is an atheist.[1]

Career

[edit]

In addition to his scientific research, he is known for his lectures and writings making science intelligible to a wider audience and promoting physics outreach.

From Oxford he went to Stanford University in California for two years as a Postdoctoral Fellow on the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. In 1973 he went to the Daresbury Laboratory in Cheshire and then to CERN in Switzerland from 1973 to 1975.[2] He joined the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Oxfordshire in 1975 as a research physicist and was latterly head of Theoretical Physics Division from 1991. He headed the communication and public education activities at CERN from 1997 to 2000. From 2001, he was professor of theoretical physics at Oxford. He was a visiting professor at the University of Birmingham from 1996 to 2002.

Close lists his recreations as writing, singing, travel, squash and Real tennis, and he is a member of Harwell Squash Club.

Honours and awards

[edit]

Christmas lectures

[edit]

His Royal Institution Christmas Lectures in 1993, entitled The Cosmic Onion, gave their name to one of his books. He was a member on the council of the Royal Institution from 1997 to 1999. From 2000 to 2003 he gave public lectures as professor of astronomy at Gresham College, London.

Publications

[edit]

In his book, Lucifer's Legacy: The Meaning of Asymmetry, Close wrote: "Fundamental physical science involves observing how the universe functions and trying to find regularities that can be encoded into laws. To test if these are right, we do experiments. We hope that the experiments won't always work out, because it is when our ideas fail that we extend our experience. The art of research is to ask the right questions and discover where your understanding breaks down."[6]

His 2010 book Neutrino discusses the tiny, difficult-to-detect particle emitted from radioactive transitions and generated by stars. Also discussed are the contributions of John Bahcall, Ray Davis, Bruno Pontecorvo, and others who made a scientific understanding of this fundamental building block of the universe.

In The Infinity Puzzle: Quantum Field Theory and the Hunt for an Orderly Universe (2013), Close focuses on the discovery of the mass mechanism, the so-called Higgs-mechanism.[7]

In his 2019 book, Trinity: The Treachery and Pursuit of the Most Dangerous Spy in History, Close recounts the life and the espionage of Klaus Fuchs who passed atomic secrets to the Soviets during the race for development of the nuclear bomb. He concludes that "it was primarily Fuchs who enabled the Soviets to catch up with Americans".[8]

Other books include: Particle Physics: A Very Short Introduction ISBN 9780192804341, Antimatter ISBN 9780199550166 and Nothing ISBN 9780199225866.

Contested claims about lunar helium‑3

[edit]

In an August 2007 Physics World article, Close argued that proposals to mine lunar helium‑3 (3He) for “clean” fusion were misguided. He wrote that in tokamaks, deuterium–3He fusion proceeds far more slowly than deuterium–tritium (D–T), that mixed plasmas would inevitably generate tritium and neutrons via side D–D and D–T reactions, and that importing 3He from the Moon would ultimately result in the very type of fusion system it was meant to avoid. He also asserted that “we don’t even know for certain if there is any helium‑3 on the Moon,” and characterized the overall lunar‑3He concept as “moonshine.”[9]

However, the existence of helium‑3 on the Moon was well established long before Close’s 2007 article. Apollo mission samples had confirmed the presence of solar-wind–implanted 3He in lunar regolith as early as the 1970s, with peer-reviewed publications reporting concentrations in the parts-per-billion range.[10] For example, soil samples from Neil Armstrong's bulk sample 10084 from Apollo 11 was measured to contain approximately 11.8 ppb of 3He.[11] By the early 2000s, remote sensing data from missions like Clementine and Lunar Prospector had been used to generate global models reaffirming the presence and distribution of helium‑3 in the lunar regolith, especially in mature, titanium-rich mare soils.[12] Given the widespread availability of this data in the scientific literature, Close’s suggestion that “we don’t even know for certain if there is any helium‑3 on the Moon” was a significant misrepresentation. This assertion contradicts decades of well-documented lunar science.

In addition, tokamak experiments have in fact produced measurable D–3He fusion: JET reported non‑thermal D–3He fusion power of ~50–140 kW in the late 1980s–early 1990s and later pulses up to ~140 kW, using 3He as a minority species for ICRF heating.[13]

Many of Close’s technical criticisms of helium‑3 fusion are supported by the scientific literature. It is widely accepted that deuterium–helium‑3 (D–³He) fusion is significantly more challenging to sustain than deuterium–tritium (D–T) fusion and that D–³He plasmas are not truly neutron-free. Side reactions, especially deuterium–deuterium fusion, inevitably produce tritium and neutrons, undermining claims of a “clean” process. In this respect, Close correctly challenged oversimplified narratives around lunar helium‑3 fusion.[14]

However, Close overstated the extent of these challenges.[14] Studies estimate that neutron production in optimized D–³He systems can be reduced to a small fraction of total fusion energy—far lower than in D–T fusion. His suggestion that using helium‑3 would effectively recreate a D–T machine overlooks this important distinction. Additionally, his claim that helium‑3 reactions produce deuterium was inaccurate; the standard helium‑3–helium‑3 fusion reaction produces two protons, not deuterium, consistent with well-established nuclear physics.

See also

[edit]

Works

[edit]
Frank Close talks about The Infinity Puzzle on Bookbits radio.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ When describing a total solar eclipse, Close wrote: "It was simultaneously ghastly, beautiful, supernatural. Even for a 21st century atheist, the vision was such that I thought, "If there is a heaven, this is what its entrance is like." The heavenly vision demanded music by Mozart; instead we had the crickets." Frank Close, 'Dark side of the moon', The Guardian, 9 August 2001, Guardian Online Pages, Pg. 8.
  2. ^ Close, Frank (December 2004). "A November revolution: the birth of a new particle". CERN Courier. 44 (10): 25–26.
  3. ^ "Subject Awards. Recipients of the Kelvin Medal and Prize". Institute of Physics. (main page of award)
  4. ^ "Officers of the BPhO. BPhO committee for the year 2003". University of Leicester.
  5. ^ "The Royal Society Michael Faraday Prize". The Royal Society. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  6. ^ https://nationalpost.com/related/topics/story.html?id=798217[permanent dead link]
  7. ^ Charitos, Panos. "Collecting the pieces of the Infinity Puzzle – An Interview with Frank Close". PH: Newsletter of the Physics Department. CERN. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
  8. ^ "Trinity by Frank Close review – in pursuit of 'the spy of the century'". The Guardian. 17 August 2019. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  9. ^ Close, Frank (3 August 2007). "Fears over factoids". Physics World. Retrieved 26 July 2025.
  10. ^ Pepin, R.O. (1970). "Rare gases in Apollo 11 lunar material". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2: 1435–1454 – via The Astrophysics Data System (ADS).
  11. ^ Hintenberger, H.; Weber, H.W.; Voshage, H.; Wänke, H.; Begemann, F.; Wlotzka, F. (February 1970). "Concentrations and isotopic abundances of the rare gases, hydrogen and nitrogen in lunar matter". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Supplement. 1: 1269 to 1282 – via The Astrophysics Data System (ADS).
  12. ^ Johnson, Jeffrey R.; Swindle, Timothy D.; Lucey, Paul G. (1 February 1999). "Estimated Solar Wind-Implanted Helium-3 Distribution on the Moon". Geophysical Research Letters. 26 (3): 385–388 – via Wiley.
  13. ^ Jaquinot, J.; Sadler, G. (1991). "D-3He Fusion in the JET Tokamak -- Recent Experimental Results" (PDF).
  14. ^ a b Crabb, J.C.; White, S.W.; Wainwright, L.P.; Kratz, S.E.; Kulcinski, G.L. (December 1993). "Fifty Years of Research in Helium-3 Fusion and Helium-3 Resources" (PDF). Retrieved 26 July 2025.
[edit]

Video clips

[edit]