This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Somalia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somalia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomaliaWikipedia:WikiProject SomaliaTemplate:WikiProject SomaliaWikiProject Somalia
Buckshot06 This article draft someone else started it and I’ve been helping improve, but it’s still not getting accepted. I’ve already cleaned up a lot (like removing irrelevant stuff and fixing issues), but it’s still stuck. Think you could take a look and help me get it into better shape? Majid8097 (talk) 07:12, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I acknowledge your request Majid8097 but currently the article talks about desires for democratic reform which is a very loose description of the intensely contested constitutional amendments that the HSM administration has introduced. There is no consensus that 1P1V can be introduced at this time - more a consensus that trying to do so would be very dangerous for voters on a voting day given Al-Shabaab, notwithstanding the problems with 4.5. The article needs to reflect all these realities. Buckshot06(talk)08:36, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. I had included historical and contextual material sometime back but during cleanup I thought they were irrelevant and so I removed them, but I now see how that might’ve made the article feel too simplified or one sided. I’ll work on reintroducing the key challenges, especially around 4.5 (which I included previously before removing). Hopefully with those back in, the draft will better reflect the full picture and and maybe be in a place you'd feel more comfortable supporting? Majid8097 (talk) 08:47, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
