User talk:SYParkOfBioneer/sandbox
![]() | This user page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resubmission note
[edit]Hi @MediaKyle:, thank you for your previous review.
As previously disclosed, I am affiliated with Bioneer Corporation and have drafted this article to provide accurate, neutral information based on reliable third-party sources.
I have thoroughly revised the draft to address your concerns: - Removed promotional language for neutrality - Added independent references (GenomeWeb, WHO PQ listings, Scientific Reports, etc.) - Clarified company history and technology claims with reliable citations
I kindly request your further review, and I welcome any additional suggestions for improvement.
Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
SYParkOfBioneer (talk) 08:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello,
I am disclosing that I have a conflict of interest, as I am affiliated with Bioneer Corporation. I have drafted this article with the intention of providing accurate and neutral information, based on reliable sources.
I kindly request that independent editors review this draft for neutrality, notability, and compliance with Wikipedia’s guidelines. If any changes or improvements are needed, please feel free to edit or provide feedback.
Thank you for your assistance.
BioneerAssistant (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Draft Submission Feedback & Notability Guidance Request
[edit]Hello,
The reason my draft submission was declined is that the current draft lacks sufficiently in-depth, reliable, and rigorously independent secondary sources to meet the inclusion criteria under Wikipedia guidelines.
Based on feedback, I have added a few new references, including links from major Korean broadcasters like Arirang TV and KBS News. However, I'm still uncertain if these additions meet the requirements. I would greatly appreciate it if experienced editors could review the draft and offer guidance.
1. Could you provide examples or suggest types of secondary sources that would be most effective in demonstrating the subject's notability, especially if the current Korean media additions are not sufficient or appropriate for this purpose?
2. Are there any specific sections or claims in the draft that you feel are still under-referenced or particularly need stronger sourcing?
Thank you for your time and support. SYParkOfBioneer (talk) 01:54, 29 July 2025 (UTC)