Draft:Adivino (2011)
Appearance
Submission rejected on 15 June 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by KylieTastic 33 days ago. Last edited by Iwannarightelle 33 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by Rambley (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Rambley 33 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by Sophisticatedevening (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Sophisticatedevening 33 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 33 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by Kovcszaln6 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Kovcszaln6 33 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by Bunnypranav (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bunnypranav 33 days ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 June 2025 by Jlwoodwa (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Jlwoodwa 33 days ago.
| ![]() |
Comment: Clearly you have no intension of even trying at this point. You have had details breakdown of the sources and the reason they fail on you r talk page and you said you understand. However you still keep submitting, and keep removing all the previous declines which you have been warned about removing. You also clearly have an undisclosed Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. KylieTastic (talk) 21:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: A minimum of three reliable sources are needed to establish notability, although more are preferred. Rambley (talk) 18:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)